Technologies, in the right hands and in sufficient quantity, will transform education. However, realizing this dream will take lots of communication among pioneers, and effective leadership. The pioneers in effective one-to-one learning environments face many important questions, and these important questions serve as the focal points of this conference.

Our keynote sessions, concurrent sessions, and informal roundtable conversations focus on questions like these, related to implementing, understanding, and enhancing the educational value of one-to-one computing:
In other words, the purpose of this conference is to connect current and future leaders of one-to-one educational computing environments, to improve both the quality education they offer and the quality of data they produce.
I'm in a session at ISTE's NECC Conference. These are the big ideas that came out of the session:
Assessment vs Evaluation:
Assessment is aimed at understanding what students know, while evaluation looks at the worth of a program or practice
PADI Principled Assessment Design for Inquiry
Angela Haydel DeBarger SRI, Inc.
It's a hard job. PADI is a system is designed to help educators create tools that enhance assessment design. From knowing what students know... observe students and interpret their behaviors.
"Task templates" describe the task
Have you seen ISTE's new NETS Standards for Students? They were just released on June 25 at the NECC Conference. The new standards are less about technology, and more about "21st century skills," including:
1) Creativity and Innovation
2) Communication and Collaboration
3) Research and Information Fluency
4) Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Decision Making
5) Digital Citizenship, and
6) Technology Operations and Concepts.
Wow.
I'm in a session at NECC, during which Jennifer Ragan-Fore showed a graph of changes in scores on the Myers-Briggs that indicate the US population may be shifting from a nation of extroverts to a nation of introverts. She says that many people attribute this to technolgy. This raised several questions in my mind.
First, is it a bad thing, or a good thing? The two labels are extreme postions, and being at either extreme may not be good. Introverts (looking within) might be a good thing, perhaps indicating more introspection and reflection.
I'm at the NECC conference, listening to a very bright, kind, ed tech blogger, David Warlick. How said smoething that we know is right, but that I have never heard before.
He pointed out that there are two digital divides: the access to tools divide, and the access to contacts divide. Students can get the equipment, but unless they are prepared to locate the contacts out there who can engage in their evelopment, they are still disadvantaged. Interesting thought. Once agan, David, you have opened my eyes.
I'm at the NECC conference, listening to a very bright, kind, ed tech blogger, David Warlick. How said smoething that we know is right, but that I have never heard before.
He pointed out that there are two digital divides: the access to tools divide, and the access to contacts divide. Students can get the equipment, but unless they are prepared to locate the contacts out there who can engage in their evelopment, they are still disadvantaged. Interesting thought. Once agan, David, you have opened my eyes.
As I listen to Grace Poli describe how she uses technology to reach and serve students for who English is not the primary language, I see a great example of a technology-literate educator with a big heart who uses technologies creatively to solve real problems.
She is also very politically astute, copying the Superintendent on all good news, and sending him notes that start, "Here's what we are doing..."
Marco's session was dynamite. He made us think about "the why," and he reminded us not to get stuck on the media, forgetting the message. He made us consider the fact that our schools have a technology plan, but not an education plan. And, he made us laugh (and perhaps get "misty" as he talked about successful students and how they must have felt. But perhaps most importantly, he reminded us that our work is extremely important.
This session features a panel of three Middle school Language Arts teachers from the State College Area School District, Andy Cunningham, Mary Lou Manhart, and Veronica Iacobazzo. They share carts with laptops -- not quite to one-to-one full time, but working toward it.
I'm sitting in a session at the Penn State One-to-One Conference in which Andy Cunningham, a middle school teacher from the State College Area School District, is showing how he took advantage of a one-to-one students/computer ratio in his first year with the technologies.