You must log in to this site in order to participate in the forum.
Takimoto-Makarczyk (1999) – "Incorporating effective interaction is central for a successful online learning experience.... In both [online learning and the traditional classroom experience], interaction is critical for successful learning."
The following are several methods of online interaction along with their benefits and hidden pitfalls.
Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) – The term relating to software and networking hardware enabling correspondents to communicate with each other via a computer.
Asynchronous Communication - Any online communication where participants can be online at different times. Common methods of asynchronous communication include e-mail, listservs, blogs, bulletin boards, newsgroups areas and threaded discussion areas.
Threaded Discussion – The pedagogical technique of using and structuring discussion forums communication in topics or "threads" to allow students to explore and express their ideas as related to an instructional topic. The Discussion Forum in the ANGEL Course management system is a threaded discussion area.
Synchronous Communication – Methods of CMC where correspondents are all on-line at the SAME TIME. Software enabling synchronous communication is also known as chatting software.
Chat – A synchronous CMC method where participants send text messages to each other at the same time. Two Penn State tools which include a chat component are the ANGEL course managment system and Breeze (Adobe Connect). Other well known chat systems include AOL Instant Messenger (AIM), iChat (Mac Only), IRC, and ICQ.
Online Conferenicing – Online conferencing systems allow users to talk over the Internet, send video signals, view each other computer screens, take polls or view online presentations over the Internet. Breeze (Adobe Connect) is a Penn State conferencing systems; others include Centra and WebEx.
Voice Chat – A chat system in which speakers can speak over the Internet.
The Discussion Forum in the ANGEL Course management system allows students to leave messages on a given topic at a time of their choosing. Users can communicate with each other at different times.
Threaded discussion means that instructors can create individual discussion forums for specific topics, thus allowing instructors to guide directions of discussions more than in other tools.
A topic contains a starting message and replies to that message. Any user may read any messages created previously, create a new topic, or reply to an existing topic.

| Benefits | Drawbacks | Suggestions |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Chat refers to any system that allows any number of logged-in users to have a typed, real-time, online conversation via a network, where each individual is at an individual computer, and individuals are usually geographically dispersed. Chats are synchronous discussions in that participants talk to each at the same.
Two Penn State tools which include a chat component are the ANGEL course managment system and Adobe Connect. Other well known chat systems include AOL Instant Messenger (AIM), iChat (Mac Only), IRC, and ICQ.
| Benefits | Drawbacks | Suggestions |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
On the one hand, e-mail is easy to use and is almost universally used. On the other hand, communications can get "lost in the shuffle." Below are some suggestions on how to more efficiently administer student e-mail.
Additional suggestions are listed on E-mail Tips and Strategies for Faculty.
| Benefits | Drawbacks | Suggestions |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Online conferencing systems, such as Adobe Acrobat Connect which include audio, video and chat support are one of the newer options available. There are great benefits because of the ability to hear and see each other, but there are currently start-up requirements (microphones, headsets, cameras) that not be automatically available to all students.
See the Adobe Acrobat Connect page for information on how to get started, including suggested headsets, cameras and equipment.
| Benefits | Drawbacks | Suggestions |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Dwyer, C.(2003). Engaging students. Retrieved May 14, 2003 from Pennsylvania State Angel Web site: http://cms.psu.edu
Garrison, D. R. (1990). An analysis and evaluation of audio teleconferencing to facilitate education at a distance. The American Journal of Distance Education, 4(3), 13-24.
Garrison, D. R.(1993). A cognitive constructivist view of distance education: An analysis of teaching-learning assumptions. Distance Education, 14(2).
Moore, M. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2),1-7.
Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (1997). Interactions in audiographics teaching and learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 34-54.
Richardson J. & E. Ting, E. (1999) Making the most of interaction: what instructors do that most affect students perceptions of their learning. Retrieved May 14, 2003 from: http://www.aln.org/conference/proceedings/1999/ppt/99_richardson.ppt
Sutton, L. A. (1999). Interaction. Retrieved May 14, 2003 from: http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~mcisaac/emc703/leah5.html
Takimoto-Makarczyk, Keiko. (1999). "Online interaction" in The Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. Retrieved 15 Dec 2006 from http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/Articles/interact/index.htm
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| bbs.gif | 23.44 KB |